Norwegian media are facing criticism for their coverage of King Harald's death, with detractors claiming the reporting lacked nuance and critical reflection, according to Aftenposten.
The criticism centers on how news outlets handled the passing of the Norwegian monarch. Aftenposten reports that commentators have taken issue with the tone and depth of the coverage, saying it was one-sided and failed to offer a more balanced perspective.
The backlash has prompted at least one major newspaper to respond. However, according to tv2.no, the publication has declined to apologize for its necrology, despite the criticism leveled against it. The outlet’s refusal to issue a formal apology suggests a divide between media professionals and their critics over what constitutes appropriate coverage of a royal death.
Other reactions have also emerged. Dagbladet notes that some observers found the coverage "special to see," indicating a broader sense of discomfort with how the story was handled across the Norwegian press. Meanwhile, VG’s reporting took a more personal angle, describing the late king smiling widely during what was described as his final sail, a detail that highlights the tension between human-interest storytelling and the more analytical approach critics say was missing.
The debate comes as Norwegian media continue to reflect on their role in covering the monarchy. While some outlets have defended their reporting, the criticism points to a growing expectation that royal coverage should include room for critical examination, not just tribute.
What to watch next: Whether any major Norwegian outlet will revise its editorial approach to royal reporting in the wake of this public dispute.
